[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

[ALRubinger]

"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : For that matter, what about the rest of the org.jboss.invocation.* stuff?  And what about the org.jboss.proxy.* stuff?  Will it stay where it is, or, maybe, move to invokablecontainer?  

To be clear, invokablecontainer really offers very little above straight-up reflection that makes j.l.r.Method serializable.  Maybe a couple of convenience containers (@see the testsuite for how these work).

Its real value is in a wire protocol that's tested for both forward- and backward-compatibility.  Basically the class InvocationImpl and its tests.  

But then again, that's the scope of the thing.  Its intended to be extended via composition to add on your requirements, or supplemented w/ JBMAR or R3.

S,
ALR

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4267196#4267196

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4267196