[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

[ALRubinger]

"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : If it's intended to be generally extensible, then isn't "ejb3" in the package names misleading?  How about "invokable" in place of "ejb3"?

Yep, I started building it in EJB3, then committed into repos/common.  So either I'll refactor it, or if someone else beats me to it feel free.

S,
ALR

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4267380#4267380

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4267380