[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

[ron.sigal@jboss.com]

"ALRubinger" wrote : 
  | The groupId might change eventually too, who knows? I'd say let's just keep the naming until we know the intent of the project IMO. 
  | 

I'm not sure if you mean "naming" specifically with respect to maven, or if you're saying "leave the package names alone".

"ALRubinger" wrote : 
  | Because it didn't *need* to be public, so I scoped it down as small as possible. :) By convention lately I've been doing this so that I can have tests in the same packages and get at package-private members. 
  | 

Ah, thanks.  I guess it doesn't matter, as long as you're not in AS/testsuite.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4267400#4267400

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4267400