[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss AS Development Deployment Framework] - Re: Redundant WAR deployer redundancy

[alesj]

"emuckenhuber" wrote : 
  | AFAIK there was a discussion last year to only keep the WarStructure in the AS codebase and have a mock implementation for the deployers tests only. Adrian then ported the WarStructure to AS.
What was the reason to do so?

For me it makes more sense to keep the one in Deployers,
as then I don't have to fix/port any new features when I "mock" the .war deployment in Deployers.
And with .wars being mostly the only ones that have a bit diff CL policy,
we do/should use WarStructure a lot.

Perhaps if the AS WarStructure would in the future use some of the ext metadata classes,
we should just make sure there are properly exposed hooks in Deployer's WarStructure,
and make AS's AdvancedWarStrucutre extends WarStrucutre.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4260694#4260694

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4260694