[jboss-dev-forums] [Management Development] - domain.xml work

[Brian Stansberry]

Brian Stansberry [http://community.jboss.org/people/bstansberry%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion

"domain.xml work"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/536124#536124

--------------------------------------------------------------
> Jason Greene wrote:
> 
> > Scott Stark wrote:
> > 
> > I'm thinking that the profileservice ManagedComponent api is no longer relevant for our discussion. The fact that we introduced an indirection layer to allow for a stable metadata is only one part of what is needed. We need a well defined domain model that describes what the supported administration capabilities are for a given release. Now I'm thinking that the domain.xml is all that matters. Until a feature of the server has a representation in the domain.xml model, its not properly managable.
> 
> I totally agree. We should focus on the requirements, use-cases and the model/configuration itself. I also agree that something has to be in domain.xml for it to be truly managable. I kind of saw runtime management of components not in domain.xml as more of a stop-gap. However, it probably is easier to just focus on the domain model, and look at the non-classified runtime stuff later, if it is even relevant anymore. 

Great. I'm a lot more comfortable with this approach. Multiple different management approaches coexisting in the same management API, some of which map back to domain.xml and some not -- yuck.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/536124#536124]

Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2107]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20100407/47ec19a3/attachment.html