[jboss-dev-forums] [Management Development] - To scope or not to scope (domain.xml)

[Emanuel Muckenhuber]

Emanuel Muckenhuber [http://community.jboss.org/people/emuckenhuber] replied to the discussion

"To scope or not to scope (domain.xml)"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/536375#536375

--------------------------------------------------------------
> Brian Stansberry wrote:
> 
> Since we're in the mode of defining things, what is a "multi-domain notion?"  I see it as a an ability to manage within the same tool multiple sets of servers where each set has it's own management policy. The sets of servers are conceptually distinct (hence the separate management policy / domain) but, generally for operational ease of use reasons, users wish to manage multiple domains from the same tool.
Just to clearify what i meant with "multi-domain" - is that in this case a node can be part of more management domains.

The difference i see is that in a multi-domain notion you have multiple domains - where the "managable unit" would be the domain itself.
In case of server-groups you have a single domain - however the "manageable unit" is more or less a server-group.

In case a server should be the "managable unit" then we don't need a domain model - right?  ;) 

--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/536375#536375]

Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2107]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20100408/a7548766/attachment.html