[jboss-dev-forums] [Management Development] - To scope or not to scope (domain.xml)

[Emanuel Muckenhuber]

Emanuel Muckenhuber [http://community.jboss.org/people/emuckenhuber] replied to the discussion

"To scope or not to scope (domain.xml)"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/536534#536534

--------------------------------------------------------------
> Jason Greene wrote:
> 
> In the discussion we had at the OA&M meeting with the JON folks, we thought that the AS perspective of management ends with the domain . "Multi-domain" management was something that JON would offer, as a compelling difference. So our admin console, cli, and domain.xml interfaces would be limited to a domain. I still think this is the "right" approach.
Yes, limiting to a domain seems the right approach. But are we sure that a domain should manage a heterogenous group?

Let's put it another way - should embedded jopr manage a heterogenous group? Where is the value addon from JON? How likely is it that you have multiple heterogenous configurations within a company? Isn't that just only a small percentage where you would need that?

Grouping obviously seems to be a important. Where having a heterogenous configuration within a domain, makes this quickly quite big and complex. Splitting that up in smaller "manageable units", which have more in common than "just" a domain name - with clearer boundaries/responsibilities could help to make it easier to understand and reduce overall complexity.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/536534#536534]

Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2107]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20100409/c2a8eb77/attachment.html