[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss ESB Development] - Naming for webservice endpoints

[Tom Fennelly]

Tom Fennelly [http://community.jboss.org/people/tfennelly] replied to the discussion

"Naming for webservice endpoints"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/559712#559712

--------------------------------------------------------------
For SOAPProcessor, how about also supporting the context defined on the "jbossws-endpoint" property (eliminating the need for the "jbossws-context" property) ala:

<property name="jbossws-endpoint" value="myapp:fooservice"/>

Of course, making sure it's backward compatible etc.

For "pure" consistency between SOAPProcessor and SOAPProxy, couldn't they both be coded to also support exactly the same format for internal endpoints i.e.

<property name="jbossws-endpoint" value="foo:HelloWorldWS"/>

and

<property name="wsdl" value="foo:HelloWorldWS"/>

So in the later... the "internal" scheme is implied by the absence of a scheme.... hmmm actually "foo" would be the scheme.  Actually... something that looks odd with the SOAPProxy.  The wsdl URI is kinda corrupt when defining it ala "internal://foo:HelloWorldWS".  Looks like a URI, but "HelloWorldWS" is where a port number would be expected.  Wouldn't that be an invalid URI syntax?  Maybe ye don't care about that, but I'd have though it would be good to maintain a valid URI (parseable etc).

--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/559712#559712]

Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2032]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20100831/2ccd8476/attachment.html