[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss ESB Development] - Annotation based Action classes
Tom Fennelly
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Jun 18 11:33:08 EDT 2010
Tom Fennelly [http://community.jboss.org/people/tfennelly] replied to the discussion
"Annotation based Action classes"
To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/548744#548744
--------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah... I'm cool with keeping the requirement on the @Process annotation.
Jim also suggested we support a name field on the @Process annotation. This could be used by tooling, which is a good idea I think. We could support localized naming too, where the name is a resource bundle key.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/548744#548744]
Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2032]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20100618/622a171c/attachment.html
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list