[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss ESB Development] - Annotation based Action classes

Tom Fennelly do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Jun 18 11:33:08 EDT 2010


Tom Fennelly [http://community.jboss.org/people/tfennelly] replied to the discussion

"Annotation based Action classes"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/548744#548744

--------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah...  I'm cool with keeping the requirement on the @Process annotation.

Jim also suggested we support a name field on the @Process annotation.  This could be used by tooling, which is a good idea I think.  We could support localized naming too, where the name is a resource bundle key.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/548744#548744]

Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2032]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20100618/622a171c/attachment.html 


More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list