[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss ESB Development] - Annotation based Action classes

[Keith Babo]

Keith Babo [http://community.jboss.org/people/kcbabo] replied to the discussion

"Annotation based Action classes"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/548756#548756

--------------------------------------------------------------
Do we need another name field?  Here's what we will have with the current proposal:

o The @Process annotation gives you the freedom to name the action method whatever you want.  It could be process(), lookupCustomerId(), pinkFluffyBunnies(), ...

o The action defintiion in jboss-esb.xml already has a (required) name attribute.  The tooling can use this value to display a user friendly name.

So what do we gain from adding the name field to the @Process annoation?

`k.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/548756#548756]

Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2032]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20100618/e055b99d/attachment.html