[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] Validation on completely merged view

[henk de boer]

henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion

"Re: [jboss-metadata] Validation on completely merged view"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/600409#600409

--------------------------------------------------------------
> jaikiran pai wrote:
> 
> We did not plan to support overriding of JBoss specifc JNDI names for no-interface views, since EJB3.1 introduced a portable JNDI name scheme. You are encouraged to use the EJB3.1 jndi names instead of JBoss specific ones. 

Yes, that does make sense.

I noticed though that internally JBoss sometimes uses the non-portable names, like in e.g. JBossEnterpriseBeanMetaData. I also have spotted code like this on a couple of occasions:


 private static String getLocalJndiName(JBossEnterpriseBeanMetaData ejb, Class<?> ejbClass)
   {
      // See if local binding is explicitly-defined
      LocalBinding localBinding = ejbClass.getAnnotation(LocalBinding.class);
 
      // If none specified
      if (localBinding == null || (localBinding.jndiBinding() != null && localBinding.jndiBinding().trim().length() == 0))
      {
         String name = ejb.getLocalJndiName();
         return name;
      }
      // Local Binding was explicitly-specified, use it
      else
      {
         return localBinding.jndiBinding();
      }
   }
 


(this is from ResteasyEjbDeployer)

Code such as this never works with no-interface views, so the only way out for the user (except for patching the code) would be if the LocalBinding annotation was allowed on EJB beans without an interface.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/600409#600409]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2116]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20110416/0660332d/attachment.html