[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes

[Jonathan Halliday]

Jonathan Halliday [http://community.jboss.org/people/jhalliday] created the discussion

"Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/632595#632595

--------------------------------------------------------------
> From the Remoting perspective, the EIS name would most likely just be the full node name of the calling node

Nope, it's the name of the target node, not the originating node. If you have one parent server talking to two subordinate servers, that's two distinct EIS names, because the parent has to be able to tell the subordinates apart for recovery purposes, just as it has to be able to tell apart e.g. the Oracle and MSSQL server dbs it's talking to through the same mechanism.  Which brings up back to the other list the parent needs to maintain: a set of all the subordinates it's talked to. Well actually it's the set of all subordantes with outstanding tx, but deleting items from the list frequently is probably more trouble than its worth.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/632595#632595]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2041]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20111019/8de678ca/attachment.html