[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes

[Tom Jenkinson]

Tom Jenkinson [http://community.jboss.org/people/tomjenkinson] created the discussion

"Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/632764#632764

--------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, possibly, I wonder how much space we are going to save, but yeah, I can take a look  at that. That said, what size should we be looking at aiming for allowing node names? At the moment, it is possible that 14 bytes is enough to encode the node name? David, what should be aiming to allow size wise for a remoting node name?
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/632764#632764]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2041]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20111020/e00a976f/attachment.html