[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes
Tom Jenkinson
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Oct 20 10:21:13 EDT 2011
Tom Jenkinson [http://community.jboss.org/people/tomjenkinson] created the discussion
"Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes"
To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/632776#632776
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Little wrote:
> Aren't we mixing two different issues here? How we represent the node name within TS (within the XID structure) and how that node name is presented to users/administrators? Our top priority has to be data consistency in the presence of failures. If that means that a sys admin either can't do something for a while (because, say, a centralised name server that maps int node names to a nice string is unavailable) or has to work with ints, then I'm prepared to consider that any day over the alternative.
+1
All I want is for nodeIdentifiers to be provided to TS through the CoreEnvironmentBean as an integer and that the same recoverable instance of TS gets the same integer node name each time, I can then happily encode this in the XID and failure recovery etc proceeds as normal. What systems are used to provide that node identifier to TS should be largely a black box to me.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/632776#632776]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2041]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20111020/06651c12/attachment.html
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list