[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss AS7 Development] - infinispan question
Dan Sirbu
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Sep 8 09:47:50 EDT 2011
Dan Sirbu [http://community.jboss.org/people/lmcdasi] created the discussion
"infinispan question"
To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/625514#625514
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
In order to have the jgroups activated in as7 I add in the inifinispan subsystem setup the following entry: start="EAGER" and that for each cache-container.
The behaviour is that I would have 4 clusters started:
GMS: address=traffic_instance_PL-3-18819, cluster=cluster
GMS: address=traffic_instance_PL-3-16418, cluster=web
GMS: address=traffic_instance_PL-3-29553, cluster=sfsb
GMS: address=traffic_instance_PL-3-22689, cluster=hibernate
So far so good. The question is that I do see the some warnings. Here is an example :
08:49:28,274 WARNING [org.jgroups.protocols.UDP] (OOB-16,web,traffic_instance_PL-3-16418) discarded message from different cluster "sfsb" (our cluster is "web"). Sender was traffic_instance_PL-3-29553
Since the jgroups can define only one interface where all cluster messages are going through then I wonder if this is 'ok' since I will have messages that go from a cluster to a different cluster for 'nothing' just to get discarded.
Should each cluster have a distinct port in order to avoid the above ? If yes, how this can be achieved ?
BR,
Dan S.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/625514#625514]
Start a new discussion in JBoss AS7 Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2225]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20110908/ddcc3e46/attachment.html
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list