[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion

[Jason Greene]

Jason Greene [http://community.jboss.org/people/jason.greene] created the discussion

"Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/627831#627831

--------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Little wrote:
> 
> I suspect that the recent comments also gave credence to the fact that there was a push to get something, no matter what, into 6.0.
Just to clarify my position is

1. We need a decent stop-gap for EAP 6.0, whatever that may be
2. We need the real solution in EAP 6.1

The fork comment wasn't emotive, it was a practical reality. If the TX project was not going to do a 4 release that fixed the problem, then soemone else would have to. It's essentially the same way we handle a thirdparty project (e.g. apache) that does not share our schedule.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/627831#627831]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2041]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20110921/6640c972/attachment.html