[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Re: Transactional MSC
David Lloyd
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Wed Jul 24 08:27:22 EDT 2013
David Lloyd [https://community.jboss.org/people/dmlloyd] created the discussion
"Re: Transactional MSC"
To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/829498#829498
--------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Little wrote:
>
> OK, so I agree with you that the classloader approach is sub-optimal, but I also agree with Paul that it is the right first step to at least determine if WF can benefit from using ArjunaCore for the MSC. Assuming this proves to be the case, then any change to ArjunaCore to remove reliance on global state should be opaque to the MSC anyway, since you will be utilising it through interfaces which will not be changed by any subsequent modifications to ArjunaCore.
Yeah, that's why I said "beyond the scope of our requirements" and other disclaimer-ish language. My instinct is always to look beyond the immediate use case, even though that's a hard thing to justify in concrete terms I guess.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[https://community.jboss.org/message/829498#829498]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2041]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20130724/58a2c0e8/attachment.html
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list