[JBoss-dev] jboss-test is missing in maven2

[Rajesh Rajasekaran]

Is this assuming that I should know beforehand that a release of
jboss-test includes jboss-test.jar and jboss-test-client.jar?

Just browsing http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss
gives me a big list of modules

I might miss something like 
http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/xyz/1.0.0.CR1
where xyz.jar comes with a release of jboss-test.

Is there a way I could track all the jars that come with a release in
this case?



-----Original Message-----
From: jboss-development-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:jboss-development-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Scott M
Stark
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 9:38 AM
To: JBoss.org development list
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss-test is missing in maven2

There is still no need to redundantly use jboss-test in both the group 
id and artifact id.
group id = jboss
artifact id = jboss-test

still provides a non-conflicting repository:

http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test/1.0.0.CR1
http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test-client/1.0.0.CR1

The group id should be jboss or jboss.org and the artifact id whatever 
makes sense.

Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote:
> As far as my understanding goes...
>
> The naming convention is,
>
> RepositoryURL/GroupId/ArtifactId/VersionNo
>
> Where GroupId can be any name and ArtifactId should be the name of the
> jar.
>
> In the first case jboss is the GroupId and jboss-logging is the
> artifactId corresponding to jboss-logging-x.x.x.jar
>
> In the second case jboss.jboss-test is the groupId and jboss-test is
the
> artifactId corresponding to jboss-test-x.x.x.jar 
>
> The second convention in the best when there are multiple artifacts
for
> a version.
>
> Say for example, we have a jboss-test-x.x.jar and a
> jboss-test-client-x.x.jar.
>
> Then we would have 
>
http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test/jboss-test/1.0.0.CR1
>
>
http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test/jboss-test-client/1.
> 0.0.CR1
>
> In this case following the first convention would bring artifacts of
> different products under the same group.
>
> Any other explanations?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jboss-development-bounces at lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:jboss-development-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Alexey
> Loubyansky
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:45 AM
> To: JBoss.org development list
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss-test is missing in maven2
>
> Could someone, please, explain the naming/path convention in the
> repository?
>
> For example, for jboss-logging it's
> http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-logging/
>
> but the jboss-test is in the
> http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/jboss/jboss-test/jboss-test/
>
> Thanks,
> Alexey
>
>   
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development