[jboss-dev] Re: [Fwd: Re: Beta3 status] - please reply

[Dimitris Andreadis]

Rajesh, release task here:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBQA-1270

Thanks
/D

Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote:
> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> Forwarding to jboss-dev as it seems most people missed it.
>>
>> =========================================================
>>
>> I've applied the tag but there are some things I want to clarify 
>> before actually releasing:
>> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/tags/JBoss_5_0_0_Beta3/
>>
>> - Ales & Pete (after a long long night) are done with the Seam tests. 
>> They report however
>> that Seam is dog slow on AS5.
>> - Alexey had some minor issues with the templates (done now?)
>> - The testsuite looks pretty good
>>
>> I've triggered the tck5 runs last night and they show regressions in 
>> the following:
>>
> 
> Sorry, missed the email as it landed in the wrong place in my inbox.
> 
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-ejb30/
> 
> The last run is consistent with the latest status on ejb30 (~ 326 
> failures) + some persistence runs which have been crashing on recent 
> ejb30 runs in hudson.
> 
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-saaj/
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-j2eetools/
> 
> These 2 modules are back to normal.
> 
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-jaxws/
>>
> 
> jaxws and jws modules had the reverse test classes built with our tools 
> removed from tck svn.
> Now i have made building those as part of the hudson run.
> the recent run of jws is back to 100%
> I have forced a run on jaxws now with with the reverse classes built and 
> they should be at 100%
> 
>> I don't really understand why those would come up and whether those 
>> results are reliable so
>> I triggered more runs to verify. Can the respective owners take a look 
>> (EJB3 and WS).
>>
> 
> Overall, TCK5 will be at 98.75% at the end of the ongoing ejb30 and 
> jaxws runs. I see no regressions.
> 
>> I've also asked Rajesh to setup a JBossWS-2.0.2.GA-testsuite-AS5.0.x 
>> build but we couldn't
>> get this to work, the testsuite wouldn't compile since some of the 
>> jars are moved around.
>>
> 
> The run i had set up was on the JBossWS 2.0.2.GA release tag where the 
> testsuite no longer compiles as Dimitris pointed out.
> The error can be seen here.
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBossWS-2.0.2.GA-testsuite-AS5.0.x/1/console 
> 
> 
> The only way to verify this is with the latest testsuite from JBossWS 
> trunk against latest AS5. Thomas, do you already have these verified on 
> JBWS hudson?
> 
>> Can this be fixed or what is the proper runs to look for, on jbossws' 
>> own hudson server?
>>
>> http://jbws.dyndns.org:8180/hudson/view/AS%20Tests/
>>
>> /Dimitris
>>
>> Scott M Stark wrote:
>>> The run that picks up mc 2.0.0.beta9, the juddi rollback, etc is done
>>> and looks good. Time to tag.
>>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-TestSuite-sun15/256/ 
>>>
>>
>>
>