[jboss-dev] Re: slf4j

[Steve Ebersole]

I asked a question, and folks (especially you) seem more intent on answering 
some other unasked question.  So not sure whats the point of your continued 
replies.  But thanks anyway.

JUL is not an option for reasons which I already stated a couple of messages 
above.  Plus the fact that noone in java (except you apparently) uses JUL nor 
even knows how to configure it or set it up.  But thanks anyway.

I find this line of reply annoying.  But thanks anyway.


On Friday 06 July 2007 03:23:32 am Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On 7/6/07, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 July 2007 01:25:17 pm Scott M Stark wrote:
> > > No, as I was loathe to introduce yet another logging wrapper.
> >
> > My concern with the org.jboss.logging.Logger stuff is specifically the
> > lack of MDC/NDC style capability.
> >
> > Basically it comes down to the fact that I want to migrate Hibernate away
> > from commons-logging for numerous reasons (the classloader leaking stuff
> > being primary).  Given that fact, I want the API to which I move to
> > support MDC (NDC is generally more useful for what I want to do but could
> > be spoofed with MDC).  That means I can move to log4j, slf4j, or logback.
> >  Out of those, slf4j seemed the most reasonable in terms of allowing easy
> > integration with various environemtns.
>
> As I said a couple messages above, java.util.logging is more robust,
> and allows formatters which could use thread local variables (I find
> this habit of using hypish names to refer to simple pre-existing
> things to be very annoying).
>
> You don't really seem to be interested in our opinion overall, and
> seem to be willing to use slf4j anyway, so I'm not sure what's the
> point of posting here.
>
> Rémy
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development