[jboss-dev] RE: Differrences in CC runs for the AS testsuite

[Rajesh Rajasekaran]

This is a vmware instance used only for projects that require frequent runs,
only jboss-4.2-testsuite at this time, doesn't have parallel runs going on.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitris Andreadis [mailto:dandread at redhat.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 2:15 PM
To: Rajesh Rajasekaran
Cc: 'JBoss.org development list'; QA
Subject: Re: Differrences in CC runs for the AS testsuite

That would explain the major time difference. What about the other machine?
Is it doing a 
'single' CC run at a time or multiple ones (like different projects) ?

Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote:
> This testsuite runs currently on 2 different machines. 
> Looking at the runs over the last 10 days,
> The runs which are scheduled to run frequently takes anywhere from 150 -
180
> minutes.
> The nightly run which goes on a different machine takes 220+ minutes.
> (I am disabling this nightly run to avoid confusion).
> 
> At least now we have a lesser margin to worry about (150-180 min). 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jboss-qa-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:jboss-qa-bounces at redhat.com] On
> Behalf Of Dimitris Andreadis
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 1:49 PM
> To: JBoss.org development list; QA
> Subject: Differrences in CC runs for the AS testsuite
> 
> The exact same CC run for jboss-4.2-testsuite-sun-1.5 with close to zero
> code changes, took 
> at different times:
> 
>
http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.2-testsuite-sun-1.5?l
> og=log20070619084727Lbuild.42
> 171 minutes 32 seconds
> 
>
http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.2-testsuite-sun-1.5?l
> og=log20070619114948
> 159 minutes 47 seconds
> 
>
http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.2-testsuite-sun-1.5?l
> og=log20070619102946
> 227 minutes 51 seconds
> 
> So the slowest run took 42% more time than the fastest run. Obviously this
> has an impact in 
> all time sensitive tests.
> 
> Is the CC machine loaded with other stuff? What else could explain the
time
> differences?
> 
>