[jboss-dev] AS5 boot screwed up

[Dimitris Andreadis]

Ok, I'm nearly there (locally) with an overall rollback of the 17 commits, but won't commit 
anything.

If you somehow get stuck, give me the green light :)

Adrian wrote:
> Let me do it. I'm nearly there in getting a minimum of rollbacks
> to make the server boot.
> 
> Once I've done that I'll commit it so that others can work,
> then I'll do the rest afterwards.
> 
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:04 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> I'll try to see if reverting those changes locally works, then try a rollback in a single 
>> commit.
>>
>> Adrian wrote:
>>> I think you're correct, there's lots of little commits. :-(
>>>
>>> After reverting the transaction module change, I've now got
>>> problems with the MDB's ServerSessionPool.
>>>
>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: No ClassLoaders found for:
>>> org.jboss.jms.asf.ServerSessionPoolLoader
>>>         at
>>> org.jboss.mx.loading.LoadMgr3.beginLoadTask(LoadMgr3.java:306)
>>>         at
>>> org.jboss.mx.loading.UnifiedClassLoader.loadClassImpl(UnifiedClassLoader.java:290)
>>>
>>>
>>> An alternative strategy would be try to complete Francisco's
>>> change by fixing the main configuration of the server.
>>>
>>> But this will leave lots of broken tests in the testsuite 
>>> until they are also updated with the correct configuration.
>>>
>>> e.g. MDB tests with specific JMSContainerInvoker configuration
>>> will fail until they are updated to use the JCA 1.5 inbound resource 
>>> adapter config.
>>>
>>> e.g.2 There's still lots of tests using the now
>>> non-existant org.jboss.tm.TxManager on the client side.
>>>
>>> Also, the embedded project is broken since it hasn't yet been
>>> updated to use the new TM.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:47 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>>> Those are the revision numbers (first one was last):
>>>>
>>>> Should we revert one by one in reverse order?
>>>>
>>>> 65826, 65825, 65820, 65819, 65818, 65817, 65816, 65815, 65814, 65813, 65812, 65811, 65810, 
>>>> 65809, 65808, 65807, 65806
>>>>
>>>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>>>> I just noticed Franscisco's check-ins this morning. I think we need to 
>>>>> revert the changes for now, but unfortunately the check-ins done were 
>>>>> multiple.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adrian wrote:
>>>>>> Why has the transaction module been removed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The stuff required to make this work properly is still WIP:
>>>>>> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4516
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact, I'm currently working on fixing up the testsuite
>>>>>> to make this possible at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The XIDFactory stuff is expected as per the subtask:
>>>>>> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4517
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:12 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>>>>>> After the removal of the transaction module, booting the 'default' 
>>>>>>> and 'all' configs complains initially for the missing 
>>>>>>> org.jboss.tm.XidFactory, then about missing jbossts libs...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development