[jboss-dev] AS5 testsuite failures

Tue Oct 23 12:07:11 EDT 2007

Adrian wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:58 -0500, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Adrian wrote:
>>> When I look at this code, it looks like it is doing an infinte wait,
>>> shouldn't this have a timeout?
>>>
>>> http://fisheye.jboss.org/browse/JBossCache/core/tags/2.0.0.GA/src/org/jboss/cache/CacheImpl.java?r=4237
>>>
>> Arguably yes, although only as a second line of defense against a bug. 
>> Which there appears to be here. You only get to the wait call if 
>> channel.getState() returns true (line 1270 in the above linked rev.) 
>> The getState call has a timeout.  In your case it should *not* have 
>> returned true, as your node is the only cluster member.
>>
>> Vladimir/Manik, does anything here ring a bell?  E.g. was there any 
>> change in the Channel.getState() behavior in JG 2.5.0?  Adrian's seeing 
>> this in AS trunk, which is using JBC 2.0.0.GA and JG 2.5.0.GA.
>>
> 
> Make sure you do an rm -rf thirdparty or use a clean checkout
> so you can be sure you have all the latest jars.
> 

Yeah, I did.

>> Adrian, has some kind of parallelization of deployment been introduced? 
> 
> No. But each service is free to do some startup asynch by forking
> a thread.
> 
>> Your logging seems to show JBoss Messaging deployment proceeding in 
>> parallel with deployment of cluster-beans.xml.  When I run "./run.sh -b 
>> localhost -c all" I don't see this problem (and the JBM logging occurs 
>> after the cluster-beans.xml stuff.)
> 
> So you think this could be a race? I don't see anything in the
> DEBUG messages (or the thread dump) that suggests both are
> active at the same time.
> 
> Here's the DEBUG from the last JBoss Messaging logging:
> 

Thanks for this.  I'd misread your earlier log; saw two sets of ASCII 
art showing channels starting, and thought one was JBM deployment, one 
from JBC.  Actually, they were both from JBM, which creates 2 channels.

The JBC that's hanging actually shares the 2nd channel with JBM.  This 
is likely where the problem is; some defect in the state transfer 
handling with shared channels. When I launch AS, the JBC deployment is 
happening before JBM; for whatever reason for you it's JBM then JBC. 
I'll add a depends or something to force JBM to go first on my setup and 
I bet I'll see the same thing you do.

> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,335 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.jms.server.connectionfactory.ConnectionFactory] Started
> jboss.messaging.connectionfactory:service=ConnectionFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,336 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.system.microcontainer.jmx.ServiceControllerLifecycleCallback]
> Registered MBean jboss.jgroups:service=MultiplexerChannelFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,337 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Ignoring create call;
> current state is Started
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,337 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Ignoring start call;
> current state is Started
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,362 DEBUG [org.jboss.cache.jmx.CacheJmxWrapper]
> Registered in JMX under jboss.cache:service=EJB3SFSBClusteredCache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,362 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> starting service jboss.cache:service=EJB3SFSBClusteredCache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,362 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> Registering service jboss.cache:service=EJB3SFSBClusteredCache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,373 DEBUG [org.jboss.cache.jmx.CacheJmxWrapper]
> Registered in JMX under
> jboss.cache:partitionName=DefaultPartition,service=HAPartitionCache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,374 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> starting service
> jboss.cache:service=HAPartitionCache,partitionName=DefaultPartition
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,374 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> Registering service
> jboss.cache:service=HAPartitionCache,partitionName=DefaultPartition
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,384 DEBUG [org.jboss.cache.jmx.CacheJmxWrapper]
> Registered in JMX under jboss.cache:service=ClusteredSSOCache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,384 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> starting service jboss.cache:service=ClusteredSSOCache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,384 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> Registering service jboss.cache:service=ClusteredSSOCache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,390 DEBUG [org.jboss.cache.jmx.CacheJmxWrapper]
> Constructing Cache
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,797 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.factories.InterceptorChainFactory] interceptor chain
> is:
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.CallInterceptor
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.UnlockInterceptor
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.PessimisticLockInterceptor
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.ReplicationInterceptor
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.NotificationInterceptor
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.TxInterceptor
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.CacheMgmtInterceptor
> class org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,806 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] Not using
> an EvictionPolicy
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,815 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] cache
> mode is REPL_ASYNC
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,815 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] Created
> Multiplexer Channel for cache cluster DefaultPartition-ClusteredSS
> OCache using stack udp
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,844 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.marshall.VersionAwareMarshaller] Initialised with
> version 2.0.0 and versionInt 20
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,844 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.marshall.VersionAwareMarshaller] Using default
> marshaller class org.jboss.cache.marshall.CacheMarshaller200
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,844 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] Using
> marshaller org.jboss.cache.marshall.VersionAwareMarshaller
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,845 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] Block
> received at 127.0.0.1:32787
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,899 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Invoked on
> cache instance [127.0.0.1:32787] and InvocationContext [Invocation
> Context{methodCall=MethodName: _block; MethodIdInteger: 43; Args:
> ()transaction=null, globalTransaction=null,
> optionOverrides=Option{failSilently=false, cacheModeLocal
> =false, dataVersion=null, suppressLocking=false,
> forceDataGravitation=false, skipDataGravitation=false},
> originLocal=true, txHasMods=false}]
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,899 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Setting up
> transactional context.
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,899 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Setting tx
> as null and gtx as null
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.ReplicationInterceptor]
> isLocalCommitOrRollback? false; gtx = null
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.PessimisticLockInterceptor]
> PessimisticLockInterceptor invoked for method MethodName: _block;
> MethodIdInteg
> er: 43; Args: ()
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.PessimisticLockInterceptor] bypassed
> locking as method _block() doesn't require locking
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.CallInterceptor] Passing up method
> MethodName: _block; MethodIdInteger: 43; Args: () so it gets invoked on 
> cache.
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.UnlockInterceptor] Attempting to release
> locks on current thread.  Lock table is {}
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.ReplicationInterceptor] Non-tx and non
> crud meth
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Resetting
> invocation-scope options
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,900 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] Block
> processed at 127.0.0.1:32787
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,902 INFO
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache]
> viewAccepted(): [127.0.0.1:32787|0] [127.0.0.1:32787]
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,902 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] UnBlock
> received at 127.0.0.1:32787
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Invoked on
> cache instance [127.0.0.1:32787] and InvocationContext [Invocation
> Context{methodCall=MethodName: _unblock; MethodIdInteger: 44; Args:
> ()transaction=null, globalTransaction=null,
> optionOverrides=Option{failSilently=false, cacheModeLoc
> al=false, dataVersion=null, suppressLocking=false,
> forceDataGravitation=false, skipDataGravitation=false},
> originLocal=true, txHasMods=false}]
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Setting up
> transactional context.
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Setting tx
> as null and gtx as null
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.ReplicationInterceptor]
> isLocalCommitOrRollback? false; gtx = null
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.PessimisticLockInterceptor]
> PessimisticLockInterceptor invoked for method MethodName: _unblock;
> MethodIdInt
> eger: 44; Args: ()
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.PessimisticLockInterceptor] bypassed
> locking as method _unblock() doesn't require locking
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.CallInterceptor] Passing up method
> MethodName: _unblock; MethodIdInteger: 44; Args: () so it gets invoked o
> n cache.
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.UnlockInterceptor] Attempting to release
> locks on current thread.  Lock table is {}
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.ReplicationInterceptor] Non-tx and non
> crud meth
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] Resetting
> invocation-scope options
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] UnBlock
> processed at 127.0.0.1:32787
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,903 INFO
> [org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.DefaultPartition-ClusteredSSOCache] CacheImpl
> local address is 127.0.0.1:32787
> 
> Got bored waiting here. ;-)
> 
> 2007-10-23 14:32:30,094 INFO
> [org.jboss.bootstrap.microcontainer.ServerImpl] JBoss SHUTDOWN
> 
> 
> There's no JBoss Cache logging before this, only some generic
> clustering logging (I've included where jms is using clustering
> but otherwise stripped its logging):
> 
> 
> 2007-10-23 14:28:27,360 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> starting service jboss.jgroups:service=MultiplexerChannelFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:27,360 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceController]
> Registering service jboss.jgroups:service=MultiplexerChannelFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:27,364 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Ignoring create call;
> current state is Stopped
> 
> ...
> 
> 2007-10-23 14:28:27,367 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Starting JChannelFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:27,367 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Started JChannelFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:27,368 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.jmx.MessagingPostOfficeService] Starting
> jboss.messaging:service=PostOffice
> 2007-10-23 14:28:27,378 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.jmx.MessagingPostOfficeService]
> org.jboss.messaging.core.jmx.MessagingPostOfficeService at 14b7042 uses
> Multiplexe
> rJChannelFactory
> 
> 2007-10-23 14:28:28,110 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Passing unique node id
> 127.0.0.1:1099 to the channel as additional data
> 2007-10-23 14:28:28,121 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Passing unique node id
> 127.0.0.1:1099 to the channel as additional data
> 2007-10-23 14:28:28,214 INFO  [STDOUT] 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> GMS: address is 127.0.0.1:32786
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 2007-10-23 14:28:30,306 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.GroupMember]
> org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.GroupMember
> $ControlMembershipListener at 334
> cb9 got new view [127.0.0.1:32786|0] [127.0.0.1:32786], old view is null
> 2007-10-23 14:28:30,386 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.MessagingPostOffice]
> org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.MessagingPostOffice at 1c86116:
> 127.
> 0.0.1:32786 joined
> 2007-10-23 14:28:30,386 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.GroupMember] First view
> arrived
> 2007-10-23 14:28:30,387 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.GroupMember] We are the first
> member of the group so no need to wait for state
> 2007-10-23 14:28:30,391 INFO  [STDOUT] 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> GMS: address is 127.0.0.1:32787
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 2007-10-23 14:28:32,412 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.MessagingPostOffice] Updated
> failover map:
> 
>              0->0
> 
> 2007-10-23 14:28:32,427 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.MessagingPostOffice]
> org.jboss.messaging.core.impl.postoffice.MessagingPostOffice at 1c86116
> puts 
> replicant locally: JVMID->6-fnu8e48f-1-yvy7e48f-0gpx6x-d24o4c5
> 
> ...
> 
> 2007-10-23 14:28:32,872 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.jms.server.endpoint.ServerConnectionFactoryEndpoint]
> updateClusteredClients being called!!! clientFactoriesToUpdate.size = 0
> 
> ,,,
> 
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,335 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.jms.server.connectionfactory.ConnectionFactory] Started
> jboss.messaging.connectionfactory:service=ConnectionFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,336 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.system.microcontainer.jmx.ServiceControllerLifecycleCallback]
> Registered MBean jboss.jgroups:service=MultiplexerChannelFactory
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,337 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Ignoring create call;
> current state is Started
> 2007-10-23 14:28:34,337 DEBUG
> [org.jboss.ha.framework.server.JChannelFactory] Ignoring start call;
> current state is Started
> 

-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com