[jboss-dev] Re: ServiceBindingManager status?

[Brian Stansberry]

Re: farming, it's really just a glorified system for keeping local file 
systems in sync around the cluster.  It only makes conceptual sense in 
conjunction with the basic.ProfileServiceImpl, the one that's based off 
scanning the local file system. AIUI, the basic.ProfileServiceImpl isn't 
what we want to go forward with.

Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> I believe SBM is enabled in the ServiceController.
> 
> Nevertheless my point is, we shouldn't retire things expected to work 
> from 4.x until we have working alternatives. Same goes for 'farming'.
> 
> Scott M Stark wrote:
>> I don't thinks its important. Beyond the wrapper you would still need to
>> enable the sbm in the ServiceController.
>>
>> Brian Stansberry wrote:
>>> That sounds like my #2. Or are you saying load the whole unrefactored
>>> thing from the deployers dir, but via a -service.xml? Possible but don't
>>> know if that would cause issues.
>>>
>>> I can spend a couple hours today/tomorrow experimenting with the wrapper
>>> concept, and maybe simply deploying via service.xml. But I don't want to
>>> waste effort unless there's agreement that getting SBM to work for Beta4
>>> is an important goal.  And if there's consensus (e.g. from Remy) that
>>> whatever I'm trying is an acceptable temporary measure if it works.
>>>
>>

-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com