[jboss-dev] jgroups version names

[Trustin Lee]

It would be my pleasure to be a jest if I can learn something.  On top
of that, I entertained you - two birds with one stone!

2008-03-06 (목), 13:20 -0600, Steve Ebersole 쓰시길:
> You are confused by this?!?!?!  Surely you jest...
> 
> On Mar 6, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Trustin Lee wrote:
> 
> > You are right.  I was confused.  :)
> >
> > According to the Wiki page Dimitris mentioned [1], there's no _CP
> > suffix.  Is it deprecated by .SP suffix?
> >
> > [1] http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossProductVersioning
> >
> > 2008-03-06 (목), 09:17 -0500, Ian Springer 쓰시길:
> >> Trustin,
> >>
> >> You may be thinking of the cumulative patch versioning convention,
> >> X.Y.Z.ABC_CPnn, e.g.: 4.0.5.GA_CP08
> >>
> >> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> >>> No, it's, X.Y.Z.SP1, X.Y.Z.SP2, ...
> >>>
> >>> SP comes after GA alphabetically, so we are safe.
> >>>
> >>> Trustin Lee wrote:
> >>>> I thought it was X.Y.Z.GA_SP1 and X.Y.Z.GA_SP2 according to the  
> >>>> recent
> >>>> discussion, no?  I also find GA_SPn has a clearer meaning.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2008-03-04 (화), 14:41 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis 쓰시길:
> >>>>> I think the existing internal versioning scheme of jgroups is  
> >>>>> fine,
> >>>>> I'm just asking for consistency when putting the binaries in the
> >>>>> repositories, e.g.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.Beta1
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.Beta2
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.CR1
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.CR2
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.CR3
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.CR4
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.GA
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.SP1
> >>>>> X.Y.Z.SP2
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bela Ban wrote:
> >>>>>> Okay, well some releases are adhering to this standard... :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I didn't care much for this because it is stupid. Relying on
> >>>>>> strings for version comparison is terrible, as we have to parse  
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> strings into component parts (numbers) anyway. Plus we end up  
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>> kludges like changing RC1 to CR1 so alphabetical ordering still
> >>>>>> works ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A much better way, and that's what I thought we had adopted, is  
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> scheme suggested by Scott in
> >>>>>> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=77231.
> >>>>>> This allows us to use shorts for major, minor and patch versions,
> >>>>>> and comparisons become simple.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note that we don't care about comparisons between 2.6.2.CR1 and
> >>>>>> 2.6.2.GA, because the scheme suggested by Scott doesn't care  
> >>>>>> about
> >>>>>> the qualifier. These 2 versions are both the same the point of  
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> version number.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Having said that, if this cannot convince you, I can adhere to  
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> version numbering scheme, that's not an issue for me, as the
> >>>>>> underlying version stays the same, it is just the strig that  
> >>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> >>>>>>> - You're missing some '.GA' suffixes (e.g. 2.5.2 in both repos,
> >>>>>>> 2.6.2 maven only)
> >>>>>>> - Some versions appear both with & without the '.GA' suffix  
> >>>>>>> (e.g.
> >>>>>>> latest 2.6.2 in the legacy repo)
> >>>>>>> - In some cases using '-' instead of '.' (e.g. 2.5.0-GA, maven  
> >>>>>>> repo)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Am I missing something?
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> jboss-development mailing list
> >>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> jboss-development mailing list
> >>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> jboss-development mailing list
> >>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jboss-development mailing list
> >> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> > -- 
> > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> > _______________________________________________
> > jboss-development mailing list
> > jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> 
> 
> -----------------------------
> Steve Ebersole
> 
> Project Lead
> http://hibernate.org
> steve at hibernate.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
-- 
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/attachments/20080307/0503dafc/attachment.bin