[jboss-dev] JBoss_5_0.xsd is wrong
Alexey Loubyansky
alexey.loubyansky at redhat.com
Thu Nov 27 07:35:38 EST 2008
Adrian (or anybody who may know),
what is the difference between activation-config and
default-activation-config (which is defined in jboss_5_0.xsd for
message-driven bean type)? Do we have to have both or can we choose just
one?
Thanks,
Alexey
Adrian Brock wrote:
> As part of a test of this
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6013
>
> I've created a test that uses the jboss_5_0.xsd
> for an MDB.
>
> The test works but the
> org.jboss.test.xml.DDValidatorUnitTestCase
> is saying my jboss.xml is invalid
>
> The reason is that the xsd says I can't have
> an <activation-config/> in jboss.xml
>
> This is obviously wrong since it works
> and JBossMessageDrivenMetaData has such an element.
>
> In fact, there are many things you can now have
> in jboss.xml (virtually anything from ejb-jar.xml)
> that are not listed in this schema.
>
> I'm going to commit this and leave it to somebody
> working on the metadata project to fix the schema
> and therefore the test.
>
> Using this class
> http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/common/jbossxb/trunk/src/test/java/org/jboss/test/xb/builder/SchemaPrinter.java?revision=2555&view=markup
> with the SchemaBinding created by the schema builder
> will help in seeing the difference in the actual
> versus the documented schema.
>
> Under the new rules, I should be allowed to
> break the testsuite if it shows something is broken.
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list