[jboss-dev] [Fwd: [jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: Getting rid of conf/jboss-service.xml]

[Scott Stark]

You mean bootstrap.xml references it. I assume this was because of the 
other services in conf/jboss-service.xml using the bindings. If no 
deployers due, this should be moved to deploy/bindings-jboss-beans.xml.

Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> It's only needed because the naming-jboss-beans.xml descriptor 
> references it, I think.
>
> If we simplify the descriptor, we should be able to do without it.
>
> Scott Stark wrote:
>> I don't think we want the bindings service in minimal. Do we still 
>> need the bindings.xml in bootstrap?
>>
>> P.S. I forgot about the minimal config. Should that be part of the 
>> smoke-tests?
>>