[jboss-dev] juddi-service in default config?

[Richard Opalka]

I wouldn't put juddi-service.sar to default config too Alessio.

Richard

Anil Saldhana wrote:

> Isn't the default config supposed to contain services that are 
> commonly used by majority of users?  juddi service does not fit the 
> bill IMO.
Alessio Soldano wrote:
>> I was talking about this with Dimitris some time ago (actually a lot 
>> of time ago...sorry). What about having juddi-service in the default 
>> conf? Opinions?
>> Cheers
>> Alessio
>>
>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>> I wouldn't change that in AS 4.2, but for AS5 this is something we 
>>> could discuss either on the dev-list or on the forums. Do you want 
>>> to start a thread?
>>>
>>> Alessio Soldano wrote:
>>>> Well, I don't know which is the rule to choose what goes to 
>>>> "default" and what only to "all". This said, it's true in my 
>>>> opinion that uddi is not so used by users. Anyway if you want to 
>>>> add juddi to default conf, I don't see any problem (as a matter of 
>>>> fact we add it when deploying jbossws over an existing jboss 
>>>> instance).
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Alessio
>>>>
>>>> Dimitris Andreadis ha scritto:
>>>>> The last run showed 6 remaining failures, the jaxr ones. I saw 
>>>>> juddi-service.sar will be copied in the default/deploy dir, so I 
>>>>> suppose the next run will be clean.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why we don't include juddi-service.sar in the default config. Is 
>>>>> it because it's not always necessary with WS?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alessio Soldano wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Rajesh,
>>>>>> - the json failures should now be fixed (missing jettison.jar in 
>>>>>> the AS thirdparty). I'm waiting for the next build of the AS on 
>>>>>> hudson
>>>>>> - the jaxr tests fail because there's not a juddi service in the 
>>>>>> default conf; I think we should exclude them in that job, run 
>>>>>> against a jboss configuration having the juddi-service (perhaps 
>>>>>> "all"), or deploy juddi before running those tests
>>>>>> - the jbws1814 should be fixed too (a X509 certificate expired, I 
>>>>>> simply updated it with another one which just have an expiration 
>>>>>> time far in the future)
>>>>>> - the enums test has now a fixme;  I've spoken with Darran as it 
>>>>>> seems to be related to some work he has been doing recently on 
>>>>>> jbossxb. New version of jbossxb pointed out that that test is not 
>>>>>> written in the right way and need to be rewritten.
>>>>>> I didn't create a new tag for the last 2 points because no real 
>>>>>> changes were performed.
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Alessio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rajesh Rajasekaran ha scritto:
>>>>>>> Hi Alessio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The job is configured to run on the tag for the version 
>>>>>>> installed in AS-4.2.x
>>>>>>> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossws/stack/native/tags/jbossws-native-3.0.1.GA 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If there is a new tag or any changes done in the branch to 
>>>>>>> accommodate any fixes you make, please let me know,
>>>>>>> i can change accordingly. Every run uses the latest build of AS 
>>>>>>> from Branch_4_2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Rajesh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alessio Soldano wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Dimitris,
>>>>>>>> I'm working on this. The wsse failure is fixed, currently 
>>>>>>>> looking at the other ones.
>>>>>>>> I'll let you know as soon as possible.
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>> Alessio
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dimitris Andreadis ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any update on:
>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5726
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We need to wrap things up ASAP!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> /Dimitris
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development


-- 
B.Sc. Richard Opalka
Senior Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat

Mobile: +420 731 186 942
Mail: ropalka at redhat.com