[jboss-dev] AS 5.1 and JBoss Messaging 2

[Jason T. Greene]

I really wish we could. Tim said theres pretty much no was JBM2 can make 
Beta1, but it could make CR1. The question is, would it be stable and 
TCK compliant enough that it doesn't end up delaying GA?

Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> Why not keep it simple and ship JBM2 in AS 5.1 Beta/CR? I suppose it's a 
> matter of dates, right?
> 
> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>> Because that is just configuration. Shipping just 1.4 in the 
>> community, and 1.4 and 2.0 in EAP is completely backwards from the 
>> whole upstream concept.
>>
>> David Ward wrote:
>>> Why would this be weird?  .com/EAP 4.x has a "production" profile 
>>> that .org/AS 4.x does not...
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>>> Part of the problem is that EAP is planning on including a JBM2 
>>>> profile / option. IMO it would be very weird to ship something in 
>>>> EAP but not in AS. Besides creating a profile, another option we 
>>>> have is to include JBM2 with an install script in docs/examples. 
>>>> Then someone could switch any AS profile to JBM2.
>>>>
>>>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>>>> We have enough configurations so far, so I don't think it's a good 
>>>>> idea adding any new ones until we come up with with a way to share 
>>>>> most of the jars/configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> In your case it's better to offer the preview as a separate download.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy Taylor wrote:
>>>>>> As part of the AS 5.1 release we will be shipping JBM 2.0 as a 
>>>>>> technology preview. This will require 1 or more new profiles to be 
>>>>>> created. I have created a branch (Branch_5_x_JBM2) to use for now 
>>>>>> which i will merge in once JBM 2.0 is released and there is 
>>>>>> something concrete and working.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What new profiles we need to add is open to discussion. We'll 
>>>>>> definitely need a copy of default as a start which could be called 
>>>>>> messaging-2. However, from a JBM2 point of view, it would be good 
>>>>>> to also demonstrate clustering which would mean a copy of all, say 
>>>>>> messaging-2-all, and since JBM2 can run with a minimal set of 
>>>>>> services maybe a messaging-2-minimal as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I appreciate that adding all 3 might be too many new profiles to 
>>>>>> add so I'd like to hear peoples views!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy Taylor Core Developer
>>>>>> JBoss Messaging
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>
>>


-- 
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat