[jboss-dev] Abstract classes?
David M. Lloyd
david.lloyd at redhat.com
Thu Jun 4 11:33:59 EDT 2009
On 06/04/2009 07:10 AM, Adrian Brock wrote:
> Frankly, I've got better things to do than worry about whether
> somebody can understand what a class does from its name without
> reading the javadoc or even the code (it is open source).
Figuring out what code does is useless without knowing what it's supposed
to do. The Javadoc is a critical part of this, and frankly there isn't
much on most of our codebase.
> The same goes for all the other "feeble" topics that have been drowning
> the dev-list recently.
That's pretty derisive, and I for one don't appreciate it.
> If I see another topic on logging I might even unsubscribe from the
> list. ;-)
That reminds me... ;-)
> "Rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic" is a phrase that springs
> to mind.
I'm not following your metaphor. What exactly is the titanic here? The
AS? Does that make you William Pirrie? ;-)
Seriously we all want to make things better here, and frankly we could
really use your help, not your insults.
- DML
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list