[jboss-dev] jbossas -beans.xml opt

[Jason T. Greene]

Ah, yeah now I understand what you meant. Nevermind then.

Ales Justin wrote:
> Sure, I never implied it is the same.
> I might wrote it in a confusing way.
> 
> AOP is there from day one --> @DisableAOP
> 
> @IoC & jsr-299 --> our MC IoC should support that too; annotation based ioc
> 
> And we don't use AOP with our MC @IoC.
> Just MDR, for already stated reasons.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 14, 2009, at 19:15, "Jason T. Greene" <jason.greene at redhat.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Ales Justin wrote:
>>> There is no magic.
>>> We know AOP is there from day one,
>>> and @annotation based IoC handling is a-must-have in these jsr-299 days.
>>>
>>> It's just that the sole nature of these mechanisms is not very 
>>> performance friendly.
>>
>> Annotation IoC handling != AOP. This is just an implementation we 
>> chose. The JSR-299 RI for example does not require AOP.
>>
>> The AOP dependency processing "magic" is a great example of something 
>> we don't need for container provided annotations like @JMX. Those 
>> should all be registered up-front.
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development