[jboss-dev] Abstract classes?
David M. Lloyd
david.lloyd at redhat.com
Tue May 26 11:11:26 EDT 2009
I think they *were* abstract at one point, but then someone realized that
they shouldn't be, for whatever reason. Seems like a bit of a design red
flag to me though.
- DML
On 05/25/2009 04:19 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I have seen many classes in some JBoss core projects whose names start
> with "Abstract" but the classes are *not* abstract. Just to cite an
> example, there's AbstractInjectionValueMetaData - not picking on this
> specific class, but this is just an example. Any reason why we are
> naming them Abstract?
>
> regards,
> -Jaikiran
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list