[jboss-dev] Abstract classes?

David M. Lloyd david.lloyd at redhat.com
Tue May 26 11:11:26 EDT 2009


I think they *were* abstract at one point, but then someone realized that 
they shouldn't be, for whatever reason.  Seems like a bit of a design red 
flag to me though.

- DML

On 05/25/2009 04:19 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I have seen many classes in some JBoss core projects whose names start 
> with "Abstract" but the classes are *not* abstract. Just to cite an 
> example, there's AbstractInjectionValueMetaData - not picking on this 
> specific class, but this is just an example. Any reason why we are 
> naming them Abstract?
> 
> regards,
> -Jaikiran
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development



More information about the jboss-development mailing list