[jboss-dev] Looking for Wow factor in AS 5.x

Andrew Lee Rubinger andrew.rubinger at redhat.com
Mon Sep 14 11:11:31 EDT 2009


On 09/14/2009 10:45 AM, Robb Greathouse wrote:
> It is interesting that all the wow factors seem to be in the products/projects vs being in the core AS.
>
> Am I wrong in seeing it that way?

I think that's exactly how we should be pushing forward, leaving AS as 
an integration point for various projects.  The AS then provides runtime 
and lifecycle.

S,
ALR
>
> Robb Greathouse
> JBoss
> CELL   505-507-4906
> OFFICE 505-255-2652
> FAX    505-554-2834
>
> ----- "Ales Justin"<ales.justin at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Simply go over BMW's blog:
>>    - http://oddthesis.org/theses/jboss-rails/projects/jboss-rails
>>
>> Robb Greathouse wrote:
>>> Do tell.  Do you have more detail.
>>>
>>> Robb Greathouse
>>> JBoss
>>> CELL   505-507-4906
>>> OFFICE 505-255-2652
>>> FAX    505-554-2834
>>>
>>> ----- "Ales Justin"<ales.justin at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like the ease with how TorqueBox was developed / integrated.
>>>>
>>>> Robb Greathouse wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am putting together a workshop for JBoss AS 5.x.  I am looking
>>>> for
>>>>> some real wow factors.  And frankly, even after talking to the
>> core
>>>>> developers (who agree) I am not finding any wow factors.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Robb Greathouse JBoss CELL 505-507-4906 OFFICE 505-255-2652 FAX
>>>>> 505-554-2834 SKYPE rgreathouse
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- "Shelly McGowan"<smcgowan at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RE:
>>>>>>>> Also, let me know if you have a component you would like to
>>>>>>>> update/include that has low impact.
>>>>>> jboss-test and jboss-server-manager currently include alpha
>>>>>> releases; specifically,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.test</groupId>
>>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-test</artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>1.1.5-alpha-2</version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.jbossas</groupId>
>>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-server-manager</artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>1.0.3-alpha-2</version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These were needed as part of ALRs new bootstrap implementation
>>>>>> (JBASM-30, JBASM-31). Are these alpha versions acceptable for
>> the
>>>>>> Beta1 release or would you prefer .GA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shelly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development
>>>>>> mailing list jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>>> _______________________________________________ jboss-development
>>>>> mailing list jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development

-- 
Andrew Lee Rubinger
Sr. Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
http://exitcondition.alrubinger.com



More information about the jboss-development mailing list