[jboss-dev] Weird thought of the day: maven-based booting
Bill Burke
bburke at redhat.com
Thu Apr 1 17:32:26 EDT 2010
BTW, I got this idea when I was doing testing with RESTEasy against AS 6
trunk. My thought was, "wouldn't it be cool if AS just loaded RESTEasy
from my local maven repository so that I didn't have to manually copy to
or rebuild the AS distribution?" I guess what I'm saying is that it
would help make us more productive too.
Also, from a product standpoint, it would be very easy for us to define
and ship different profiles. A profile would be so small, it could
easily be archived and distributed through a maven repository. Could
easily be sent across the wire for support engineers to look at, etc.
Bill Burke wrote:
> instead of the way our JBoss AS distribution is structure now, why not
> introduce the idea of maven-based booting and deployment?
>
> Core components (specifically deployers, sars, really anything in the
> JBoss domain) of a profile (default, minimal, all, etc.) would only
> include bean.xml and other configuration files. Within beans.xml or a
> different file, each deployment unit would specify its dependencies,
> either through <dependency> elements, or a list of maven artifacts, i.e.
>
> org.jboss.resteasy:resteasy-jaxrs:2.0
>
> That way our distribution can be either very very tiny, just a zip of
> text files that point to our maven repository. Or, very optimized, we
> ship a maven repository with the distribution that shared between the
> different profiles.
>
> This could get very interesting over time. Deployment units could
> delegate to the base AS for versioning, much like maven modules delegate
> to a parent pom for dependency versions. We could automatically create
> scoped deployments or issue warnings if base AS and the deployment unit
> require different library versions, etc.
>
> Just a thought...
>
> Bill
>
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list