[jboss-dev] Renaming server/web to server/jbossweb-standalone

[Dimitris Andreadis]

I know this is premature, but whenever/if we need to claim full ee certification, we need to 
ship the tested profile/configuration.

So you suggest something like:

default (EE web)
jbossweb
all (everything and their brothers)
[javaee] (EE full?)

Two points:

a) maybe the standalone jbossweb should be "rebranded"? :) See HornetQ, etc.

b) making 'default' being the EE web one causes more confusion? What other people think?

Jason T. Greene wrote:
> The big picture is going to depend somewhat on what happens with the 
> profile service in AS6, however in general I would like the default 
> profile to be our EE6 Web Profile configuration (with some extras). I 
> expect this to be the most desired configuration. Standard should be 
> dropped as it is no longer relevant. All could remain to be what it is 
> today (everything including the kitchen sink).
> 
> I would have proposed dropping server/web, but Remy is using it right 
> now for his jbossweb servlet 3 distro.
> 
> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> I think it would help to explain overall what you would like to see as 
>> the supported profile/configurations in AS6 (or later) so that we get 
>> the big picture.
>>
>> E.g. in another thread I had suggested a possibility to simplify things:
>>
>> 0) remove 'minimal', or make it more like an empty osgi container
>> 1) 'default' merged with 'standard' and certified for full EE 
>> compliance (at some point), configured for development.
>> 2) 'web' certified for EE web-profile compliance, configured for 
>> development.
>> 3) 'all' an extension of 'default' configured for development
>>
>> Now whether to have a more lightweight 'jbossweb' or just reuse the 
>> 'web' one, I think we should hear from Remy, too.
>>
>> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>> In order to prevent confusion between server/web and the EE web 
>>> profile, I would like to rename server/web to be jbossweb-standalone, 
>>> since this is what it is currently being used for.
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>>
> 
>