[jboss-dev] Integration of naming deployers failed

Carlo de Wolf cdewolf at redhat.com
Tue Jan 12 11:08:47 EST 2010


We don't have CI. Something I've been bitching about for some time.
I agree completely that each commit must be automatically tested through 
each integration suite.

Carlo

On 01/12/2010 04:02 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> Am I wrong in thinking that these naming commits were introduced to
> trunk/ (because Hudson caught it)?  If so,  you really can't be
> introducing errors like this.  Such fundamental changes need to go
> through the automated test cycle before they are committed.  Otherwise
> you're going to screw up everybody else that is working off of trunk.
> Especially considering every "maven install" that is done pulls in new
> snapshots.
>
> Ales Justin wrote:
>    
>> Yes, like I told you n-times, the api for scoped stuff is poor atm. ;-)
>> To get around this, we used unique name and "real" alias via @Aliases
>> annotation.
>>
>> Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>      
>>> Hmm, BeanMetaDataDeployer.undeploy doesn't take scoping into account and
>>> will undeploy a 'random' context.
>>>
>>> Carlo
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2010 01:52 PM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>>        
>>>> The initial runs on Hudson show no success. After a couple of
>>>> deployments it goes poof with the following error:
>>>>
>>>>          
>    




More information about the jboss-development mailing list