[jboss-dev] Integration of naming deployers failed
Carlo de Wolf
cdewolf at redhat.com
Tue Jan 12 11:11:22 EST 2010
This works up to a certain point. Our own Hudson can't scale that high
if we all wanted to run every test suite I would want on it.
Secondly, merging in svn is a bitch and you loose information during
execution. Upgrading the svn server to 1.6 would give back some, but not
all.
Carlo
On 01/12/2010 04:17 PM, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
> A technique DML and I have enjoyed in the past is a private branch to
> hold new (potentially volatile) commits; point your private Hudson
> instance to it and run the AS testsuite on your own before merging into
> the mainline trunk.
>
> S,
> ALR
>
> On 01/12/2010 10:02 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>> Am I wrong in thinking that these naming commits were introduced to
>> trunk/ (because Hudson caught it)? If so, you really can't be
>> introducing errors like this. Such fundamental changes need to go
>> through the automated test cycle before they are committed. Otherwise
>> you're going to screw up everybody else that is working off of trunk.
>> Especially considering every "maven install" that is done pulls in new
>> snapshots.
>>
>> Ales Justin wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, like I told you n-times, the api for scoped stuff is poor atm. ;-)
>>> To get around this, we used unique name and "real" alias via @Aliases
>>> annotation.
>>>
>>> Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm, BeanMetaDataDeployer.undeploy doesn't take scoping into account and
>>>> will undeploy a 'random' context.
>>>>
>>>> Carlo
>>>>
>>>> On 01/12/2010 01:52 PM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The initial runs on Hudson show no success. After a couple of
>>>>> deployments it goes poof with the following error:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list