[jboss-dev] Further profling: Where should I focus?

[Brian Stansberry]

Ok, confirmation is good. But yeah right after posting my message I read 
Carlo's on the other thread and thought the same thing. :)

On 01/14/2010 10:07 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> Let's wait for Richard confirmation (he just left), but from his commits
> I think at least part of the problem was basically the same Carlo's
> mentioned in "Re: [jboss-dev] Integration of naming deployers failed"
> regarding modules names that need to be unique.
> Cheers
> Alessio
>
> Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Can you give an example? If there was a change in AS behavior that
>> forced you to change your deployments, I'd like to understand better
>> what the change was.
>>
>> On 01/14/2010 05:40 AM, Richard Opalka wrote:
>>
>>> I fixed the tests (to have unique archive names inside ear).
>>> Now all JBossWS tests pass against AS trunk, see 601 jobs at:
>>>
>>> http://jbossws.jboss.org:8180/hudson/
>>>
>>> IOW MC upgrade is ok for JBossWS, no problems since now ;)
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>> On 01/13/2010 03:45 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you have some spare cycles to try and analyze the cause of some of
>>>> those failures, it would be very helpful. If you find anything, the "MC
>>>> 2.2.x update" thread on this list is the best place to report them.
>>>>
>>>> On 01/13/2010 08:30 AM, Richard Opalka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yes,
>>>>>
>>>>>         it's nice it boots faster.
>>>>> However there are still some issues, e.g.
>>>>> http://jbossws.jboss.org:8180/hudson/job/NATIVE-CORE-AS-6.0.1-SUN-JDK-6/28/
>>>>> that have to be addressed/identified :(
>>>>>
>>>>> Rio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss by Red Hat