[jboss-dev] JMX stuff WAS Re: M2 planning and timeline

[Adrian Brock]

On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 09:32 +0100, Adrian Brock wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:45 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> > It would be interesting to see if their is any performance difference using our or JDK's 
> > mbeanserver implementation.
> > 
> 
> It doesn't seem to make an appreachable difference for the boot time
> or running the basic tests. It might show a difference if you
> stressed an MBeanServer.invoke() like we do in EJB2?
> 
> Anyway, I've added this to trunk now. You can try it with
> 
> ./run.sh
> -Djavax.management.builder.initial=org.jboss.jmx.mbeanserver.JBossMBeanServerBuilder
> 
> I seem to have a bug with the remote jmx usage and classloading
> which I need to investigate. e.g. using the jmx-remoting.sar
> classloader instead of the jmx deployment's classloader.

I've fixed the classloader problem.

We might want to run the full testsuite over it at some point when the
testsuite has been tidied up?
-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss by Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx