[jboss-dev] VFS3 (in AS trunk) - Non .jar file handling
Ales Justin
ales.justin at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 06:31:59 EST 2010
Ah, yes -- see SARArchiveFilter.
But this can easily be fixed -- we simply write "smarter" SARArchiveFilter.
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Ales Justin wrote:
>> <snip/>
>>
>> that mounts your .bak archive -- since "*" was used to filter the contents of jboss-service'xml' classpath.
>>
>> Putting "*.jar" there should fix your problem -- dunno if this should be the proper fix?
> Tried that after Dimitris mentioned it. But only a * wildcard is
> supported in that attribute. It can't handle *.jar. The alternative is
> to explicitly mention the entire list of archives (which isn't
> practical). The documentation of "archives" attribute states:
>
> <!-- The archives attribute specifies either the '*' wildcard to
> indicate all contents of the
> codebase should be included, or a comma seperated list of the jars to
> include.
> -->
> <!ATTLIST classpath archives CDATA #IMPLIED>
>
> regards,
> -Jaikiran
>
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>
>>> I suppose you could control that from conf/jboss-service.xml?
>>>
>>> Still it's a different behavior, as you suggest
>>>
>>>
>>> <server>
>>>
>>> <!-- Load all jars from the JBOSS_HOME/server/<config>/lib directory and
>>> the shared JBOSS_HOME/common/lib directory. This can be restricted to
>>> specific jars by specifying them in the archives attribute.
>>> TODO: Move this configuration elsewhere
>>> -->
>>> <classpath codebase="${jboss.server.lib.url}" archives="*"/>
>>> <classpath codebase="${jboss.common.lib.url}" archives="*"/>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>>>> I see a new behaviour with VFS3 in JBoss AS. Earlier in AS-5/6 (with
>>>> VFS2) and AS-4 (without any VFS), to try out some quick fixes, i used to
>>>> rename existing jar files to end with .bak name and replace them with
>>>> the new patched jar file. So for example, if i had a fix in
>>>> jboss-ejb3-core.jar, i would:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Rename the JBOSS_HOME/common/lib/jboss-ejb3-core.jar to
>>>> JBOSS_HOME/common/lib/jboss-ejb3-core.jar.orig.bak
>>>> 2) Place a patched jboss-ejb3-core.jar in JBOSS_HOME/common/lib
>>>> 3) Restart the server
>>>>
>>>> The server would then pickup the new patched jar file and ignore the
>>>> .bak file. After testing the fix, i would then revert back to the
>>>> original jar file by renaming it back to its original name.
>>>>
>>>> However, with the recent upgrade to VFS3 in AS trunk, i notice that even
>>>> the .bak is used for classloading (following is the output from
>>>> -verbose:class JVM argument):
>>>>
>>>> [Loaded org.jboss.ejb3.EJBContainer from
>>>> file:/NotBackedUp/jpai/business/jboss/wc/jbossas/trunk/build/target/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/common/lib/jboss-ejb3-core.jar.orig.bak/]
>>>>
>>>> Looks like VFS3 picks up this non .jar suffix file for classloading. Is
>>>> this expected? Shouldn't it be looking for only .jar files (atleast in
>>>> this context)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> -Jaikiran
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list