[jboss-dev] How to bind object to JNDI from jmx-jboss-beans.xml

[Scott Marlow]

On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:09 +0200, Adrian Brock wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 14:57 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> > On 03/25/2010 02:05 PM, Adrian Brock wrote:
> > > By using the JMX connector in the JDK you loose the ability to do
> > > remote JMX invocations that are involved in user transactions.
> > 
> > How is this a bad thing?  That there's even an expectation that 
> > transactions will "work" over JMX seems crazy to me.  It's ok to 
> > discontinue features which don't make sense.
> > 
> 
> It's a bad thing because you've deleted a feature.

Yeah, I feel very naughty and bad about this.  Maybe not so bad since
there are other ways to propagate transactions between tiers.

> 
> The requirement is not completely off the wall, since it came
> up in the JMX 2.0 spec committee. We decided there that we
> wouldn't address it, since the mechanism depends upon
> the transport, e.g. UserTransaction in JavaEE or "current"
> in CORBA, etc. So its really an implementation detail
> (value add) of the protocol.