[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-2695) LRUStatefulContextCachePolicy implementation of maxBeanLife removal is flawed
Ben Wang (JIRA)
jira-events at jboss.com
Sat Jul 15 00:25:11 EDT 2006
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2695?page=comments#action_12339639 ]
Ben Wang commented on JBAS-2695:
--------------------------------
Scott, what do you think? Is it relevant anymore? I'd prefer not to spend time on this since I don't this is a big deal, per se. :-) But if it is, I can do it.
> LRUStatefulContextCachePolicy implementation of maxBeanLife removal is flawed
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-2695
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2695
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: EJB2
> Affects Versions: JBossAS-3.2.8RC1, JBossAS-4.0.3 SP1
> Reporter: Scott M Stark
> Assigned To: Ben Wang
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: JBossAS-4.0.5.CR1
>
>
> The RemoverTask of the org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LRUStatefulContextCachePolicy performs removal of passivated beans based on a maxBeanLife - maxBeanAge diff. This is invalid for beans passivated due to size. The calculation should be maxBeanLife - (the per bean instance time of inactivity). The reason is a bean may be passivated very quickly due to cache size constraints and if the maxBeanLife - maxBeanAge == 0, just a quickly thrown away.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list