[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBAS-4383) Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR

Stan Silvert (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Apr 30 16:25:30 EDT 2007


     [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4383?page=all ]

Stan Silvert resolved JBAS-4383.
--------------------------------

    Resolution: Partially Completed

Unit test for this has only been committed to trunk.  It will be committed to the 4.2 branch after GA.

> Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBAS-4383
>                 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4383
>             Project: JBoss Application Server
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: JavaServerFaces
>    Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.2.0.CR2, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta2
>            Reporter: Stan Silvert
>         Assigned To: Stan Silvert
>             Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.0.GA,  JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta3, JBossAS-5.0.0.GA
>
>
> Prior to JEE5, most developers would bundle a JSF implementation such as MyFaces with the WAR.  With AS 4.2 and 5.0, you should instead rely on the JSF implementation that ships with the container.
> However, for these legacy applications that rely on a particular implementation, we can disable the built-in JSF implementation as long as you stick with the default classloader settings.  To disable the built-in JSF, you will add this to your web.xml:
> <context-param>
>      <param-name>org.jboss.jbossfaces.WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL</param-name>
>      <param-value>true</param-value>
> </context-param>

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        



More information about the jboss-jira mailing list