[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBAS-4383) Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR
Stan Silvert (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Apr 30 16:25:30 EDT 2007
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4383?page=all ]
Stan Silvert resolved JBAS-4383.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Partially Completed
Unit test for this has only been committed to trunk. It will be committed to the 4.2 branch after GA.
> Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-4383
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4383
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JavaServerFaces
> Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.2.0.CR2, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta2
> Reporter: Stan Silvert
> Assigned To: Stan Silvert
> Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.0.GA, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta3, JBossAS-5.0.0.GA
>
>
> Prior to JEE5, most developers would bundle a JSF implementation such as MyFaces with the WAR. With AS 4.2 and 5.0, you should instead rely on the JSF implementation that ships with the container.
> However, for these legacy applications that rely on a particular implementation, we can disable the built-in JSF implementation as long as you stick with the default classloader settings. To disable the built-in JSF, you will add this to your web.xml:
> <context-param>
> <param-name>org.jboss.jbossfaces.WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL</param-name>
> <param-value>true</param-value>
> </context-param>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list