[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBPM-845) transient variables between process and subprocess

[Harald Strack (JIRA)]

     [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-845?page=all ]

Harald Strack updated JBPM-845:
-------------------------------

                  Summary: transient variables between process and subprocess  (was: ransient variables between process and subprocess)
    JBoss Forum Reference: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=91506
    SourceForge Reference: http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1677789&forum_id=240086

> transient variables between process and subprocess
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBPM-845
>                 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-845
>             Project: JBoss jBPM
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Core Engine
>    Affects Versions: jBPM 3.1, jBPM 3.1.1,  jBPM 3.1.2, jBPM 3.1.3, jBPM 3.1.4
>            Reporter: Harald Strack
>         Assigned To: Tom Baeyens
>         Attachments: patch
>
>
> Hi,
> why is there not the same functionality for transient variables as for persistent ones when copying variables from a superprocess to a subprocess (process state)?
> I have seen this thread
> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=70407
> The proposed solution as seen in jira
> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-399
> is implemented in jbpm 3.1.2 that I am actually using.
> I think this solution is simple (and buggy: it only works when you also habe some persistent
> varibale mappings!) but does not fit for the most common case, that a superprocess calls
> a common suprocess and the subprocess does not know anything about the superprocess.
> More specific, there could be different superprocesses with different transient variable names.
> These superprocesses may call a general subprocess...
> Using the present solution forces the subprocess to know about all possible variablenames of
> all possible superprocesses - that's really bad! What we need is varible scoping.
> What can we do?
> Is it is not difficult to implement similar code for transient variables as you did for persistent ones.
> Patch for 3.1.3 and 3.1.4 following...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira