[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JGRP-394) Performance enhancements

[Bela Ban (JIRA)]

     [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-394?page=all ]

Bela Ban updated JGRP-394:
--------------------------

    Description: 
- NAKACK.handleMessage(): NakReceiver.add() --> Retransmitter.add() --> TimeScheduler.add() is quite costly; we also iterate through a linear 
list when removing a message from the Retransmitter !
- Bundler: sending is over-synchronized; use ConcurrentHashMap for msgs
- GroupRequest and RequestCorrelator eat CPU cycles in MessageDispatcher: remove them ?

  was:
- NAKACK.handleMessage(): NakReceiver.add() --> Retransmitter.add() --> TimeScheduler.add() is quite costly; we also iterate through a linear 
list when removing a message from the Retransmitter !
- Bundler: sending is over-synchronized; use ConcurrentHashMap for msgs


> Performance enhancements
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: JGRP-394
>                 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-394
>             Project: JGroups
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Bela Ban
>         Assigned To: Bela Ban
>             Fix For: 2.5
>
>
> - NAKACK.handleMessage(): NakReceiver.add() --> Retransmitter.add() --> TimeScheduler.add() is quite costly; we also iterate through a linear 
> list when removing a message from the Retransmitter !
> - Bundler: sending is over-synchronized; use ConcurrentHashMap for msgs
> - GroupRequest and RequestCorrelator eat CPU cycles in MessageDispatcher: remove them ?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira