[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Reopened: (JBPM-913) ProcessBean.startInstance does not set ProcessInstance.key, causing second process start for any user to fail
David Lloyd (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri May 18 10:11:53 EDT 2007
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-913?page=all ]
David Lloyd reopened JBPM-913:
------------------------------
Yes, I know these databases allow null values in a constraint column.
But the semantics work like this:
If KEY_ is null and PROCESSDEFINITION_ is null, no entry is made into the unique index. THIS is the behavior that matches what you are talking about.
If KEY_ is null and PROCESSDEFINITION_ is NOT null, an entry is made into the index with just the process definition ID. Since KEY_ is null, that part of the index is "blank". Therefore an insert of another process instance with a process definition but no key will cause a constraint violation.
That's why I suggested that if this constraint is to exist in any form, then there should be a single column that is null unless both the key and process definition is specified, in which case the string value of the column would be something like "123:ProcessKey" where 123 is the process definition ID.
Otherwise this constraint should be removed.
> ProcessBean.startInstance does not set ProcessInstance.key, causing second process start for any user to fail
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBPM-913
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-913
> Project: JBoss jBPM
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Web Interface
> Affects Versions: jBPM jPDL 3.2
> Reporter: Kevin Klinemeier
> Assigned To: Tom Baeyens
>
> The web console isn't setting the ProcessInstance.key value. This value has a unique constraint across key_ and processdefinition_
> To reproduce, either:
> run against a non-hypersonic database and attempt to create two process instances for any one process definition.
> or
> run against hypersonic, writing data to a file. Inspect Process_Instances to see constraint violated by null, which apparently isn't caught by hypersonic.
> It's not clear to me how to correctly populate this field.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list