[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBMESSAGING-1167) Store the reference to the object instead of serializing object upon JBossObjectMessage.setObject.

P Duffy (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Nov 29 18:32:46 EST 2007


    [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-1167?page=comments#action_12389882 ] 
            
P Duffy commented on JBMESSAGING-1167:
--------------------------------------

Thanks for that Tim.  

Let me run it back at you to be sure I understand the caveat.  When we use this "local VM object ref" feature, it would be wise to destroy the message immediately after send to avoid any misadvertant change to the message, correct?

P.S.  When do you anticipate 2.0 Beta to be available?  And will 2.0 be shipping with EAP 5.0?

Cheers





> Store the reference to the object instead of serializing object upon JBossObjectMessage.setObject.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBMESSAGING-1167
>                 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-1167
>             Project: JBoss Messaging
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0.SP1
>            Reporter: Jay Howell
>         Assigned To: Tim Fox
>             Fix For: 2.0.0 Beta
>
>
> Object Serialization happens in the JBossObjectMessage.setObject  and then the reference to the object is set to null.  This means that if you are delivering messages within the same JVM, the objects still have to go through serialization.  This request is to delay serialization until it needs to be sent across the wire. 
> This is a performance optimization aimed at preventing unnecessary serialization.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        



More information about the jboss-jira mailing list