[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (EJBTHREE-1330) EJB timer service should use a thread pool to avoid OOM
Galder Zamarreno (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Apr 28 07:37:08 EDT 2008
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1330?page=comments#action_12410885 ]
Galder Zamarreno commented on EJBTHREE-1330:
--------------------------------------------
A different timer service will likely required for EJB 3.1 and that
might include clustered support, so there's a slight chance existing
EJB timer service won't be changed.
Need to verify with Dimitris.
> EJB timer service should use a thread pool to avoid OOM
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: EJBTHREE-1330
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1330
> Project: EJB 3.0
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: pool
> Affects Versions: AS 4.2.2.GA, AS 5.0.0.Beta4
> Reporter: Galder Zamarreno
> Assigned To: Galder Zamarreno
> Priority: Minor
>
> The default EJB timer service used by the EJB3 layer is based on
> org.jboss.ejb3.timerservice.jboss.JBossTimerServiceFactory which delegates
> to the standard org.jboss.ejb.txtimer.EJBTimerService.
> For EJB3 beans using the EJB timer service the thread local pool should not be used.
> Since the current EJB timer service creates a new thread for each timer being created, the
> thread local pool will create a matching instance of the bean for that thread. Thus the number
> of active instances in total can effectively grow unchecked and thus an OOM will occur.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list