[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-806) Message: investigate making the overhead for headers smaller
Bela Ban (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Jul 31 04:12:26 EDT 2008
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12423151#action_12423151 ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-806:
-------------------------------
#1 Okay, I changed resize() to be unsynchronized.
#2 I have resize() double its capacity, but then changed it to linear growth. This is optimized for an average number of 3 headers. I certainly never have more than 10 headers, so I didn't want to double the size
#3 The Message.getHeaders() method is not called by any important method other than Event.toString(), which I changed to call Message.printHeaders()
Note that you *can* iterate over the array without producing garbage: the getRawData() method of Headers allows you to do this
> Message: investigate making the overhead for headers smaller
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-806
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-806
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 2.6.4, 2.7
>
>
> Related to https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-805.
> See whether we can make the overhead for ConcurrentHashmap in Message smaller. Potentially reduce the number of buckets for each CCHM (default: 16, IIRC). Or replace CCHMs altogether ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list