[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (EJBTHREE-1222) Methods named 'void remove()' are interpreted as EJBObject.remove() or EJBLocalObject.remove()

[Andrew Lee Rubinger (JIRA)]

    [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1222?page=comments#action_12404703 ] 
            
Andrew Lee Rubinger commented on EJBTHREE-1222:
-----------------------------------------------

Regression introduced: ejbthree1127 - Checks to "ensureEjb21ViewComplete" on the ProxyFactories must be guaranteed to be called (currently only in place for SFSB remote/local).  Add support to SLSB, nothing currently calls BaseSessionProxyFactory.ensureEjb21ViewComplete().



> Methods named 'void remove()' are interpreted as EJBObject.remove() or EJBLocalObject.remove()
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EJBTHREE-1222
>                 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1222
>             Project: EJB 3.0
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Carlo de Wolf
>         Assigned To: Andrew Lee Rubinger
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: AS 5.0.0.CR1
>
>
> Methods are identified by AOP based on their hash code.
> Regardless of interface 'void remove()' will always have the same hash.
> Thus the method is interpreted by the container as being an EJBObject.remove() or EJBLocalObject.remove and goes through the EJB 2.1 view logic. (Regardless of whether it is actually annotated with @Remove!)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira